Titleman

Titleman describes itself as an AI engine for commercial real estate analysis: it reads a deal's own documents, enriches them from county, tax, zoning, listing and ownership records, and returns underwriting, value opinions, comps, feasibility studies, decks and diligence findings with the source and date of every figure.

The work is organized as six modules over one shared property record: decision support and underwriting, analytics, CRE decks, sourcing, legal and diligence, and CRM. The vendor's argument for that shape is reconciliation rather than breadth: "the comp set that priced the asset is the one printed in the OM and cited in the memo". Deliverables leave as PowerPoint, PDF, Excel with live formulas and CSV, and the product page puts the limit of the automation plainly: output is a draft with confidence "clamped to the weakest input", and a named professional on the client's team signs it.

There is no published price. The plans page says so in terms: "There is no list price on this page: the engagement is scoped with you, and the price is something we discuss when you ask." Nothing else on the site, including the FAQ-style pages and the facts page, names a figure for the product itself.

Underneath the engagement, metering is credit-based. The Platform Agreement states that access is "provided on a prepaid, credit-based basis", that each credit entitles the customer to one permitted use, that credit prices are displayed at purchase, and that unused credits "expire ninety-nine (99) days after the date they are added" and are non-refundable. Running a report over the MCP connector spends the same credits as the web app.

The demo page heads its process section "No trial. A pilot on agreed numbers." The sequence is a call, a one-page set of pilot terms covering success numbers, deals, people, dates, price and a decision date, then: "You reply yes to that page and the pilot fee is settled. Access for your team opens then, and not before." The pilot runs 14 days at most, and its fee counts toward the annual agreement if the numbers are met. One benchmark run on a deal the firm already closed is offered free of charge.

Titleman publishes a remote MCP server at https://titleman.ai/_mcp/titleman and documents it properly: OAuth 2.1 with PKCE, dynamic client registration, discovery documents, Streamable HTTP with no session, batches of up to ten JSON-RPC messages, and 30-day access tokens. The same connector is documented for Claude, ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot Studio, and ChatGPT deep research reads reports through search and fetch.

Fourteen read-only tools cost nothing and start nothing, including comparables on file, a zoning envelope for a parcel, and questions against the account's own deal documents with each passage cited to its page. Eight write tools start real runs and spend credits: BOV, comps, underwriting, highest-and-best-use, buyer list, due diligence, property search and a saved workflow. run_workflow is the one that asks first, returning an estimated charge and starting only when called again with confirm: true inside a max_usd of at most $50.

The vendor's own guide to the connector is unusually candid about the gaps: "Value Opinion, Scout, Feasibility, Excels and Legal are not exposed over MCP", the connector covers six of the eleven products, and Buyer List has had one client run in thirty days. No general REST API is published; Zapier and Slack are described as not open yet.

The security page makes four commitments and points each at a document: firm isolation with nothing pooled across customers, no training on customer content, a record of who ran what on which sources, and private deployment for corporate engagements. The no-training promise is real contract text, not a marketing line: section 12.8 of the Platform Agreement binds the vendor and its subprocessors, and adds that subprocessors "will not retain or log for human review" customer content. The DPA commits to return or deletion on request or within 30 days of the service ending, and new subprocessors are published 30 days before they start.

What is missing is an audit. The privacy policy says "SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certification programs are underway", and the Security Addendum is written in the language of reasonable measures, with security information available "upon reasonable request" and testing "at TITLEMAN Inc's discretion". No SOC 2 report, no ISO certificate and no penetration test summary is published.

Residency also needs a question in the sales call. The Security Addendum says data sits in "data centers located in agreed geographic regions" and that other regions "may be considered, subject to technical feasibility", while the privacy policy states data is hosted in ISO 27001-certified data centers in Germany. Those two statements are not the same answer, and only one of them is in an addendum a buyer signs. Neither SSO nor SCIM is mentioned anywhere.

Titleman quantifies itself more than most: up to 95% of a professional's routine work moved to AI, 337 built-in workflows, 2,100+ sources with 1,882 of them having returned data, 1,735 counties across 43 states, and median run times per product measured on production, from about 16 minutes for rent analysis to about 58 minutes for underwriting with its Excel model. The facts page dates each count and names the measurement window.

Every one of those numbers is measured by the vendor on its own runs and client engagements, and the footnote says so: "Figures vary by firm and job type." Funding and revenue are listed as not disclosed. The company is TITLEMAN Inc, a Delaware corporation, with Alex Galt named as founder on the company page and no other named executives or investors published.

It fits a CRE desk that already produces BOVs, OMs, IC memos and underwriting models on U.S. assets and wants the assembly work done before a licensed person signs. The property passport, the entity resolution through LLC chains and the cited comp set are aimed at work that has to survive an investment committee, and the lender pages extend the same engine to a loan request package.

It does not fit a buyer who wants to try software this afternoon: there is no free plan, no trial and no self-serve signup, and the first commitment is a priced pilot. It does not fit non-U.S. portfolios outside the four countries where registers exist. It does not fit a team that needs an appraisal, legal advice or a title search, which the vendor disclaims on nearly every page: "Titleman is not a broker, appraiser or law firm." Teams that need a published SOC 2 report, SSO or a predictable monthly bill will be waiting on the roadmap or on a negotiation.